“The purpose of the copying is highly transformative, the public display of text is limited, and the revelations do not provide a significant market substitute for the protected aspects of the originals,” Judge Pierre N. Leval of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit wrote, explaining the court’s decision.
Catherine Mintz
Catherine Mintz Websites
Origami Unicorn, news, reviews, essays; Catherine Mintz, a commentary on things of interest. Origami Unicorn is copyright 2006-24. Catherine Mintz is copyright 2006-24.
Google's Digital Library Wins Another Case
2015.10.16 in Commentary, Current Affairs, Lawsuits, News, Publishing | Permalink
Tags: court win, digital library, Google, last appeal, SCOTUS
Digg This | Save to del.icio.us